Following my blog on my response to Robert Murray-Smith (RMS) on his Hutchison Effect commentary, Ken Pratt sent me a link where RMS makes a statement on the field of “Cold Fusion”. His video is linked below, as is my response to him, you will see I again offerred to live debate him on the field. Given that we see him make these two videos in a short period of time, one on Hutchison Effect and another on Cold Fusion, are we to assume that he considers these effects linked? Moreover, tell me who you think he thinks has the goods in the video below. When he is clearly so poorly educated in the field, what motivates him to single certain things out over other things? What is really going on here? Is it really all for a few 10,000s of views?
Hi Robert, to be fair, on this one, you have called out some questionable players in the field of LENR, however, you appear to be woefully understudied in the overall discipline and though I really like you and your presentation skills, this makes you look bad and opportunist. Again, I extend an invitation for a live debate about the field with you.
I recommend you read
1. "EV - A Tale of Discovery" 1986, Kenneth Radford Shoulders. FREE
2. "Steps to the Discovery of Electro-Nuclear Collapse", 2000, Dr. Takaaki Matsumoto. FREE
3. "Controlled Nucleosynthesis", 2007, Stanislav Adamenko et. al.
4. "Space. Earth. Human." 2009 in Russian (2019 second edition in English), Dr. Alexander Parkhomov
For the fastest way to kill yourself with intense "strange radiation" and normal radiation, research and replicate the simple cavitation experiment conducted by LeClair and his partner in late 2000s at US military labs. All elements in periodic table were synthesised in 1 hour from water, Aluminium in a PVC tube - including transuranic and many radio-nuclides. Other cavitation designs can kill you due to strange radiation flux in the same kind of time period according to the decade long study with rats and other life forms exposed to cavitators and exploding foils by Shishkin et. al. The same radiation type is being extensively studied by Moscow Nuclear Physics Institute - don't bother to look for this work on Wikipedia.
If you need links to the FREE books, reach out. I again re-iterate that I would like a live debate about the field with you.
Hey Bob, I don't want to overvalue the comments that people are putting on videos as being so influential, but both myself, Corky and Gordon commented (without realizing each other had commented at the time initially) on this video giving references to some of the authors you provided above. I don't know if you can see them, but we did get replies so definitely some people can see them. Gordon's comment was exceptionally well written and thorough, mine was much shorter. Due to the fact all comments were public I will paste a copy of them here incase they aren't visible to you, you will see that Corky mentioned Hutchison, so it's conceivable this is how Robert drew the connections. I suspect he may have even watched some of your material by this point as the MFMP was mentioned in ALL of our comments.
My comment:
"I appreciate your explanation. It is obvious you have done a fair amount of research into this. I would however say that before one entirely dismisses the work of Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons one dig a little deeper. I believe the work of the MFMP is a good place to start. The work of researchers Takaaki Matsumoto and Kennith Shoulders. I have not replicated their work, so it is hard to be 100% certain, but it seems to pass the sniff test to me and no obvious hidden agendas to me."
Corky's comment:
"Thank you RMS for this. Surely you are aware of MFMP and Bob Greenyer? Andrea Rossi? Ken Shoulders and John Hutchison? Hope so. Me LOVES CF. Onward. Abundance. Peace."
Gordon's comment:
"The phenomenon known as Cold Fusion does, indeed, exist, although a better description is Electro Nuclear Reactions (ENR) comprising Electro Nuclear Collapse (ENC) / Electro Nuclear Regeneration (ENG - ENR was already taken!) (Takaaki Matsumoto)
In short, with a correctly engineered environment , applying repeated rapid mechanical shocks to a specific point (such as nodes in standing longitudinal waves - for example, ultrasonic sound waves - or focal points subject to high energy in-phase light waves - as produced by lasers or masers - for example, will produce standing flat vortices (vorticles) around the node that “pull matter in”, literally breaking down molecular bonds (shredding matter) to form braided (threaded) ropes, ropes that are further “pulled in”, shredding atoms of their electrons to produce flowing streams of nuclei that are, in turn, crushed and broken into alpha nuclei (which, being Bosons, stack) plus left over protons / deuterons / tritons that are finally ejected from the “poles” of the nodes, where they reform into alpha conjugate nuclei (such as Carbon-12, Oxygen-16, and so on - and offsets where there are extra protons / deuterons / tritons present) that then pull electrons out of the environment (so called cold electricity that creates a glow) - hence ENC / ENG.
With further engineering, and using cathode-anode cells , nodes can be created at Z-pinch points in the Birkeland currents that can be set up between cathode and anode and, where those Birkeland currents flow through a low pressure dusty plasma, heating the anode to the Currie point of the material it is made of while flowing hydrogen ions over the surface can create so-called Exotic Vacuum Objects (EVOS), objects with a double layer outer negative shell and positively charged inner layer, EVOS being either taurine or spherical in nature that can join or separate- or, in the case of taurine EVOs, open out to form strings, at the end of which form Falaco solitons objects, at the end of which fusion can occur - in addition to the ENC/ENG reactions (EVOS also have other properties, such as the ability to adsorb into surfaces for gravity shielding and later reactivation). So, does Cold Fusion exist? You bet - just not as a cold form of Hot Fusion - but rather a naturally occurring process that can be induced very easily - look up the ULTR experiment, the VEGA experiment, the SAFIRE experiment, Aureon energy, Brilliant Light Power, David LaPoint’s Primer Fields, the Electric Universe / Thunderbolts / the Saturn Myth and the excellent work of the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project - these are all related by THE primal force of the universe- not gravity, but electromagnetics (including nature’s preference for vortices and waves)
Finally, with the oft-made observation that nature is, well, fractal in nature, what is seen in the large is seen in the small or, as also said, “as the above, so below” and “as below, so above”. As Viktor Schauberger said, don’t fight with nature but observe and learn from it."
My reply to a doubter of Gordons Comment:
"peter
peter
1 month ago
@Mads Horn Although I would agree that those phrases are often used in the manner you describe by con men. The information Gordon is sharing with you is as far as I can tell no way an appeal for money (if I am wrong I apologize). As far as I can tell he is simply saying how I think many of us are now starting to see things. I think if you actually look into lattice confinement fusion mentioned in this very video you will find that at it's core it shares some similarities to the work of Kennith Shoulders in that the EVOS Gordon describes have an affinity to accumulate in metal. There is some quantum effect taking place that allows for sub atomic interactions. I think lattice confinement fusion is an attempt to over-simplify what is really going on in such systems. I have not and will not ever expect this technology to come to fruition via traditional channels of industry, as I consider it too disruptive. This is why I wait keenly as the barriers to individual self research as more and more information comes out along with more affordable and accessible technology may ultimately facilitate individual self research in these areas. I suspect you have made up your mind already, but if not I would suggest you look into some of the historical research and references Gordon mentions and "keep your mind open" (as cliche and con-man-like as that sounds) to the possibility that perhaps the names being given to some of these new technologies mentioned such as "lattice confinement fusion" are not entirely complete and accurate descriptions of what is going on, and there may be other historic precedents you can refer to, that show there may be a broader phenomenon at work. And if at the end of the day you choose to believe it is indeed merely "lattice confinement fusion" at the end of the day. You will be happy to know that assuming it's not a scam or about to be derailed in some horrendous catastrophe, there is a company called "clean planet" in japan (that you may want to look into), that is releasing industrial hot water boilers for factories in Japan next year based on what I understand they believe to be "lattice confinement fusion". (I have no financial interest in any organization related to cold fusion, other than so much as if it becomes available buying it would allow me to run a greenhouse in the winter to make food, without needing to spend as much money on building materials, which I feel may be important in the coming decade)"
It’s like the timing is incredible, almost like he’s decided to make these videos, but for views? It’s almost like he’s inviting an expert to correct him.
I do hope he replies. And goes away and does some reading and research. Hel hopefully learn something and his subscribers will have something mind blowing to get in to.